Evaluation of machine learning models for prediction of daily reference evapotranspiration in semi-arid India

Authors

  • Amit K. Singh ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi- 284 003, India Author
  • J. B. Singh ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi- 284 003, India Author
  • Bappa Das ICAR - Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Ela, Old Goa -403402 Author
  • Ramesh Singh ICRISAT Development Centre, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Hyderabad- 502 324, India Author
  • Avijit Ghosh ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi- 284 003, India Author
  • S.R. Kantwa ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi- 284 003, India Author

Keywords:

Machine learning models, Prediction, Reference evapotranspiration

Abstract

Reference evapotranspiration (ET ) is controlled by climatic factors; hence, its estimation provides an idea 0about the atmospheric demand of water. Machine learning techniques like elastic net (ELNET), K-nearestneighbours (KNN), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), partial least squares regression (PSLR),random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), XGBoost and cubist were employed to predict dailyreference evapotranspiration based on daily weather parameters of twenty years. Penman-Monteith methodwas used as the reference method for ET estimation. All models performed well during calibration showing 0higher coefficient of determination (R ) which ranged from 0.97 (for PLSR) to 1 (for cubist models). Mean 2absolute error during calibration ranges from 0.027 mm d for cubist to 0.607 mm d for ELNET. Cubist model -1 -1(R = 1, MAE = 0.017 mm d , RMSE = 0.027 mm d ) outperformed other models during the calibration. During 2 -1 -1validation, the coefficient of determination (R ) for the machine learning models varied from 0.819 to 1, RMSE 2varied from 0.06 to 0.60 mm d and MAE varied from 0.031 to 0.38 mm d . Based on statistical parameters, -1 -1best performance was observed for cubist model (R = 1, RMSE = 0.06 mm d , MAE = 0.031 mm d ) among the 2 -1 -1studied machine learning models for the prediction of reference evapotranspiration. Hence, the cubist modelmay be used to estimate daily reference evapotranspiration for the studied region.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Evaluation of machine learning models for prediction of daily reference evapotranspiration in semi-arid India. (2023). Range Management and Agroforestry, 44(1), 118-125. https://myresearchjournals.com/rma/article/view/35